|
|
|
|
|
1.1 For some centuries there have been cc
(distance chess) players all over the world. |
|
1.2 Historically some (most) of them are
organized in a national federation. |
|
1.2.1 In some countries there is an independent
national cc federation. |
|
1.2.2 In other countries the cc national
federation is part of an overall chess federation. |
|
1.2.3 In some countries there is more than one
cc federation, which are a member of a national umbrella cc federation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 One national cc federation per country is a
member federation of ICCF. |
|
1.3.1 ICCF has been started by those national
federation. |
|
1.4 ICCF organizes all kind of international
tournaments for the players who are a member of a national ICCF member
federation. |
|
1.4.1 Among those international tournaments are
the World Championships for countries (Olympiads) and for individual
players. |
|
1.4.2 ICCF also approves international
invitational cc tournaments organized by national ICCF member federations,
in which players can participate who are a member of a national ICCF member
federation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 ICCF awards international cc titles. |
|
1.5.1 The titles for the players are based on
their performances, which are measured by the use of the ICCF Rating
System. |
|
1.6 ICCF is affiliated to the overall world
chess organisation FIDE. |
|
1.6.1 FIDE recognises the ICCF World
Championships and the ICCF Titles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 In the era of postal chess ICCF was the only
organisation which was able to organise a wide range of international cc
tournaments. |
|
2.2 National ICCF member federations pay a small
ICCF memberships fee. |
|
2.2.1 They also pay a rating fee for the rating of their approved
international invitational tournaments. |
|
2.3 Players pay an also small entry fee to play
in the ICCF tournaments. |
|
2.3.1 Historically this fee was rather small as
the players had to spend much more money for their stamps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 ICCF is a non-profit organisation. |
|
2.4.1 All fees are used for the establishment
and the continuity of the ICCF organisation. |
|
2.4.2 All ICCF officials work on an honorary
basis. |
|
2.4.2.1 There has always been a kind of a common
sense that no-one was allowed to earn money with international cc. |
|
2.4.2.2 For some decades there has been one
exception: the former ICCF President Hans-Werner von Massow, who earned a
living as the publisher of Fernschach, the official organ of ICCF. |
|
2.4.3 Only in some international invitational
tournaments there is sometimes prize money, which is provided by sponsors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Nowadays the internet has changed the way of
communication. |
|
3.1.1 Many cc players still play within ICCF,
which has accommodated its tournaments from postal via fax to email
tournaments. |
|
3.2 On the internet several other organisations
have introduced their own tournaments. |
|
3.2.1 At first this were email tournaments, but
nowadays there are also web server tournaments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 Some of these tournaments are free for all,
others do have a commercial basis. |
|
3.3.1 Some of these organisations are successful
in attracting players. |
|
3.3.2 Some of these players are also members of
national ICCF member federations, others are not. |
|
3.4 At first sight some of these organisations
look like competitors of ICCF. |
|
3.4.1 Especially when they have a commercial
background, and when they call up the member players of ICCF national
member federations to give up this membership. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 The aims of ICCF are to organize, develop
and promote the study and practice of international cc throughout the
world. |
|
4.2 Now that the world has been changed by the
internet, ICCF must change its foundations. |
|
4.3 Therefore ICCF must recognize all other
organizations which organize international cc. |
|
4.3.1 All other organizations do have the right
to organize whatever they want. |
|
4.3.2 Let players play in whatever organization
and in whatever tournaments they want. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 Let ICCF focus on its own main tournaments. |
|
4.4.1 These tournaments are: the cycles of the
World Championships and the qualification tournaments for those cycles. |
|
4.4.2 Besides those tournaments ICCF will
continue to organize its own tournaments for the member player of the
national ICCF member federations, as long as there is sufficient interest
for those tournaments. |
|
4.4.3 ICCF should also start its own web server
tournaments, provided that the continuity of these tournaments can be paid
and can be secured. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 ICCF will approve the tournaments of other
organisations as long as they are played according to the ICCF Playing
Rules and a fee is paid for the rating of the games. |
|
4.5.1 In those tournaments ICCF title norms will
also be recognized. |
|
4.5.2 But ICCF titles will only be awarded to
those players who are nominated by a national ICCF member federation. |
|
4.5.3 This is rather similar to the FIDE
behaviour, where private tournaments (like Corus) are also approved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 The only problem that has to be solved is
that players in an approved private tournament may not be a member of a
national ICCF member federation. |
|
5.2 ICCF must accept that those players do
exist. |
|
5.3 ICCF can eventually ask a higher rating fee
for the games of those players. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 ICCF should open the possibility for this
kind of players to become a personal member of ICCF. |
|
5.2.1 In some national FIDE member federations
such a kind of personal membership also exists. |
|
5.3 Personal members of ICCF have the same
rights and duties as players who are a member of a national ICCF member
federation. |
|
5.3.1 Every year the personal members of ICCF
appoint one of them as a delegate with voting rights to the ICCF Congress. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 This document tries to make an end to the
present controversy within the international cc world. |
|
6.2 The consequence is that national ICCF member
federations give up the idea of having the complete autonomy over the
players of their nationality. |
|
6.2.1 In practice they already don’t have this
autonomy any longer, as individual players can go where they want on the
internet. |
|
6.2.2 Giving up this autonomy is the only way to
survive as a national federation on the long term, as inconsistent as it
sounds at first sight. |
|
6.2.3 National federations must focus on
national championships and on the benefits for their member players of
their ICCF membership. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 Another consequence is that the
administration management of ICCF must be brought to a higher level. |
|
6.3.1 This refers to the personal membership of
ICCF, and to the processing of the results of the games in the ICCF Rating
System. |
|
6.3.2 It might be that ICCF fees must be
increased in order to have (semi) professional solutions for a number of
administrative tasks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 ICCF, its national member federations and
its officials must be prepared to deliver these required efforts. |
|
6.4.1 This means that ICCF, its national member
federations and its officials must be prepared to see these desired changes
as a challenge, and not as a threat |
|
6.5 The challenge is to maintain the unity of
the cc players in the world and also to secure that ICCF will be the
leading organisation on its main objects: World Championships, Titles and
Ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|