ICCF Congress 2015

16th - 22nd August 2015 Cardiff Wales

ICCF 2015-001: Eliminate Ladies Titles of LIM and LGM

Michael Millstone, General Secretary

Effective, January 1, 2016, ICCF should no longer offer women opportunities to earn Lady International Master (LIM) or Lady Grandmaster (LGM) titles.

Proposal

Effective, January 1, 2016, ICCF should no longer offer women opportunities to earn Lady International Master (LIM) or Lady Grandmaster (LGM) titles.

Rationale

Correspondence chess is a game of mental ability – there is no need for a physical or psychological advantage that would offer a man an advantage.  Therefore, to offer a much lower qualification path to international ICCF titles denigrates an entire class of players.

Other Comments/Considerations

In researching this practice by reviewing past ICCF documentation and conversations with long-time ICCF officials, only two explanations of why this disparity exists were offered:

  • Alignment with FIDE.  This is no longer a realistic or valid excuse as ICCF has already set precedence of deviating from FIDE’s rules, policies, and procedures when appropriate.
  • Because correspondence chess is predominately a male sport, offering lower qualifications to titles would encourage more women to join ICCF.  An ICCF database query revealed the following:

 

Year

Active Women

1993

107

1994

120

1995

139

1996

145

1997

135

1998

134

1999

131

2000

191

2001

207

2002

212

2003

223

2004

233

2005

246

2006

136

2007

128

2008

129

2009

128

2010

136

2011

112

2012

126

2013

133

2014

144

 

This table indicates that for the past 19-years, award of diminished titles with diminished qualifications for women (as compared to men) has not resulted in any increase in female membership.

Implementing this proposal would not be retroactive.  Ladies titles earned will be retained forever.  This also does not preclude separate women events; however, the same rating and title specifications in place for men should be adopted across the board for all players, regardless of age, disability, language, political or other opinions, property, birth origin, genetic information, national origin, race, color, religion, or gender.

Relevent Documentation

ICCF Statutes (Article 10) – (information only) - “ICCF is a democratic association and does not discriminate based on race, skin colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinions, national or social origin, property, birth origin or any other status.  ICCF observes strict neutrality with respect to the internal affairs of member federations and affiliated organizations.

Tournament Rules (1.0.7) – remove the following: “The Ladies Grandmaster and Ladies International Master titles do not entitle their holders to participate in the World Championship Semi-Finals or Candidates' Tournament.”

Tournament Rules (9.1) – (information only) - “It is the sincere wish of the ICCF to award equivalent titles for equivalent achievement.”

Tournament Rules (10.1) – remove the following: “(f) Correspondence Chess Ladies Grandmaster, (g) International Correspondence Chess Ladies' Master”.

Tournament Rules (10.7 and 10.8) – remove these sections completely.

Voting Summary

Vote 1:

  • A vote of Yes will eliminate the opportunity for women to earn a separate title, effective 01/01/2016.
  • A vote of No means women will still be able to earn separately labelled ICCF women’s titles (LIM, LG) with a greatly deflated qualification system to earn the title.
  • A vote of ABSTAIN is not a vote but means the vote holder has no opinion and does not wish to represent the correspondence chess players of his or her federation in this matter.

Vote 2 (Contingent) – If Vote 1 is a YES, then:

  • A vote of Yes will allow those women playing in an ongoing tournament with Ladies titles norms available to finish the tournament.  This will be effective for all tournaments that started before 01.01.2016.
  • A vote of No means that the opportunity for women to earn a separate title will be effective 01.01.2016.
  • A vote of Abstain is not a vote but means the vote holder has no opinion and does not wish to represent the correspondence chess players of his or her federation in this matter.

Comments by Relevant Committees, Commissions, or ICCF Officers

Eric Ruch (EB)

No comments yet

Mariusz Wojnar

Being ICCF Qualifications Commissioner I have no objection. Although if this motion passes I propose to enter new international title called "Candidate International Master" with rating performance 2350.

Some persons may worry that several lady players earned norms which not resulted with title yet and their effort might be lost. I believe that maintenance of ability to calculate norms for ladies for few years (and then consequently award ladies with ladies titles) will not be a big technical problem.